|
Post by Munnaf911 on Oct 22, 2023 3:04:37 GMT -5
The case of part-time workers. With this measure, the Government considers that there are reasons of social justice that recommend making the number of years required to access a benefit more flexible, so that the principle of equality of workers is guaranteed at all times, both for part-time workers and for those full-time, thus complying with the ruling of the Constitutional Court. The norm also includes a formula to require the same effort from a full-time worker and a part-time worker. The objective is, therefore, to avoid disproportionate effects between moible number data the contributions made by the worker and the amount of the benefit that he receives. For this purpose, the legal modification attends to the periods of time with a current part-time contract, in the same way as when it comes to full-time workers. Creating the global coefficient of participation. Another issue addressed by the legislator is to break with the legal uncertainty caused by article 213.g) LGSS, which establishes as a cause for termination of unemployment protection the "transfer of residence abroad, except in cases determined by regulation" . The public employment service massively extinguished the unemployment benefit of those people.
|
|